A (Long) Argument For Science


Science should not need anything arguing for it; but, with large groups championing ridiculous ideas like intelligent design, I suppose this is necessary after all.

I wish we could get this out to people who don’t “believe” in dinosaurs, evolution, the Big Bang, or Pangaea.  Of course, that’s the nature of the problem: they don’t want to hear the facts.


  1. Your “long argument for science” is but 2 short paragraphs.

    And the concepts presented are total nonsense.

  2. The length referred to that of the 10-minute-long YouTube video attached, not to the two paragraphs preceding it.

    I’m not sure which concepts you think are total nonsense since you didn’t mention which ones you disagree with and why they are wrong.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: